 |
CENTER
FOR
PEER REVIEW
JUSTICE
|
|
 CPRJ
Think TankWhen you recruit our think tank into your
defense plan, you get our expertise and experience for a custom
plan... when to move quickly and when to wait. Every situation has
it's own timing.
Our Think Tank is a
Network of Diverse professionals
- Healthcare Lawyers many of
which are CPRJ certified
- Health care reporters
- Physicians
- Nurses
- Techies with a cause
- "Graduates" physicians who have previously been
shammed and now recovered
When you hire CPRJ you also get the full
talents and resources of the GNN Network.
|
|
|
Sign Up for Alerts
Just provide your email for the Latest
News!
Your personal information will be kept in strict confidence
and only used to answer your questions or update you on events.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Must Read!! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
We have been an integral part of the GNN News network
since 2000
|
|
One of the first notable sham peer reviews took place in Oregon
in the early 1980s. The physician who took it up with the courts
was Dr. Patrick, and the Supreme Court ruled in his favor. As a
result of the publicity surrounding this case, the Healthcare
Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) was enacted in 1986. One of the
concerns that arose from the Patrick case was a fear that no
physician would want to participate in peer review if he or she
could be potentially liable for a bad report.
The HCQIA gave immunity to hospitals and reviewers participating
in peer review. This immunity has been abused by hospitals and
physicians to harm "disruptive" physicians (ie, whistleblowers)
or financial competitors. All one must say is: "Dr. Joe Blow is
a bad doctor, which is my professional opinion in this peer
review, and this hospital should get rid of him." And poof! Dr.
Joe Blow, patient advocate, financial competitor, is gone! And
the accusing physician is immune!
What
to do when your lawyer
did not give you the success he implied
Is your lawyer CPRJ Certified?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|